Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

Arbitration in children cases

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Slug : Pearce-AprilFLJ2013-416
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 1, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101997

Her Honour Nasreen Pearce

Retired Circuit Judge:

The decision of Baker J in AI v MT (Alternative Dispute Resolution)     [2013] EWHC 100 ( Fam), [2013] 2 FLR (forthcoming) in allowing the parties to refer their dispute to religious arbitration as a means of resolving all the issues between them including those concerning their children has received much publicity. It is an important case in many respects.

The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is now very much part of the procedure in family proceedings. The establishment of the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) is now recognised as an alternative to court proceedings.

In permitting the use of religious arbitration the case of AI v MT takes  ADR a step further. The court also used its powers to decline to incorporate the arbitral award in a court order until the Jewish religious divorce known as the Get was granted by the husband.

This article examines the reasons for the court's decision against the background of the exceptional circumstances which made this unusual process possible. It also highlights the plight of women from other religious communities who suffer similar social stigma as those in this case but who have no recourse in law to relief as a result of the failure to extend the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 10A and argues the case for this discrimination to be addressed.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from