Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

Arbitration in children cases

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Slug : Pearce-AprilFLJ2013-416
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 1, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101997

Her Honour Nasreen Pearce

Retired Circuit Judge:

The decision of Baker J in AI v MT (Alternative Dispute Resolution)     [2013] EWHC 100 ( Fam), [2013] 2 FLR (forthcoming) in allowing the parties to refer their dispute to religious arbitration as a means of resolving all the issues between them including those concerning their children has received much publicity. It is an important case in many respects.

The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is now very much part of the procedure in family proceedings. The establishment of the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) is now recognised as an alternative to court proceedings.

In permitting the use of religious arbitration the case of AI v MT takes  ADR a step further. The court also used its powers to decline to incorporate the arbitral award in a court order until the Jewish religious divorce known as the Get was granted by the husband.

This article examines the reasons for the court's decision against the background of the exceptional circumstances which made this unusual process possible. It also highlights the plight of women from other religious communities who suffer similar social stigma as those in this case but who have no recourse in law to relief as a result of the failure to extend the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 10A and argues the case for this discrimination to be addressed.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from