Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Slug : Ouazzani-FLJApril2013-421
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 29, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101995

Somaya Ouazzani

Solicitor, Kingsley Napley LLP:       

This article considers the gender aspects of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements.  It focuses on the practical realities of prenuptial agreements, in particular, the negotiating and bargaining positions of parties proposing to enter into such agreements and the actual effectiveness of the 'safeguards' espoused by the Supreme Court in Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] 2 FLR 1900
 
The article argues that rarely are the parties' negotiating and bargaining positions equal, and it is more often than not, the female party who is financially disadvantaged as a consequence of not only signing the agreement, but having been impervious to the practical reality of its often intended, but sometimes unintended outcome.  
 
The article concludes by briefly looking at how these gender imbalances can be minimised to ensure that both parties always understand what it is they are entering into as a matter of practical, legal and financial reality.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from