Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles

Are our higher courts prejudiced against the role of the married woman?

Sep 29, 2018, 18:35 PM
Slug : Murray-JanFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 21, 2012, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101211

Ashley Murray

Barrister, Oriel Chambers, Liverpool:

The fairness of our legal system is acknowledged around the world. Yet, at the heart of our domestic law of capital and income distribution upon divorce, the married woman remains, by reason of historical and cultural reasons, in cases where resources exceed 'needs', the most likely spouse to recover a less than equal share of the parties' post divorce assets. The married woman is also the most vulnerable of the married parties to any failure of the judicial system to recognise her 'needs' when set against the opportunities which each will have upon marital breakdown following divorce. After many years in practice as a family law barrister, Ashley Murray, in an unapologetic analysis, which traces the struggle for justice of the married woman before English law from the birth of Christendom to William the Conqueror through Tudor times to the women's rights movements of Victoria's reign and on to the present day, challenges the current approach by our higher judiciary in the formulation of the principles and rationale underpinning the search for 'fairness' within the s 25 statutory exercise as instinctively prejudiced against the role of married women generally. He further argues that set against this position, a 'fair and equal' approach between divorcing spouses under the present legislation, which became law a generation ago, can no longer be secured without fundamental reform by Parliament.

The full version of this article appears in the January 2013 issue of Family Law.


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from