Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Parents with learning disabilities: the concept of ‘substituted parenting’ and its use in the family court context
Beth Tarleton, Senior Lecturer, University of BristolNadine Tilbury, Policy Officer for the Working Together with Parents Network (wtpn.co.uk) Over recent years, the term ‘substituted...
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, Consultant/Mediator, Anthony Gold SolicitorsA Rebooted Part 3 in force on 29 April 2024 The Part 3 rules have been reworked to make sure non-court dispute resolution ('NCDR') options...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent
The Children’s Commissioner has written a blog called "Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent".She says: "My unique responsibility as Children’s...
Tips on the efficient use of accountancy experts in family financial proceedings
Roger Isaacs, Milsted Langdon AccountantsIn this article, Roger Isaacs, an experienced forensic accountant and mediator, shares tips on the efficient use of accountancy experts in Family Financial...
View all articles
Authors

View from the President’s Chambers: expert evidence

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Title : View from the President’s Chambers: expert evidence
Slug : Munby-JulyFLJ2013-816
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jun 17, 2013, 05:49 AM
Article ID : 102853

The President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, explains the new strict regime for the use of experts in children care cases under the revised Public Law Outline (PLO): ‘We can and must reduce the excessive length of far too many care cases. In order to achieve this we must get a grip on our excessive and in many instances unnecessary use of experts'. The three pronged approach is: first, a reduction in the use of experts; second, a more focussed approach in the cases where experts are still needed; and, third, a reduction in the length of expert reports.  For example, whether or not to direct an expert's report will be an issue for the case management judge at the initial case management hearing (CMH) -  ‘when in doubt leave it out'. Furthermore, those experts who are needed must deliver their reports more promptly and in a shorter and more focused fashion and the case management judge should approve the letter of instruction at the CMH.     

The full version of this article appears in the July 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from