Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

‘We are asked in this case to reconcile the irreconcilable’: Re A

Sep 29, 2018, 18:39 PM
Slug : McCarthy-FebFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 29, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101473

Roger McCarthy QC

Coram Chambers:

This article describes the recent Supreme Court decision of Re A (Sexual Abuse: Disclosure) [2012] UKSC 60, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming) and includes a number of comments on the judgment. The Supreme Court upheld a Court of Appeal decision to order disclosure of confidential allegations which had been made by a vulnerable third party against a parent who was a party to a contact dispute. The case included a discussion of Arts 3, 6 and 8 of the European Convention and of the expectation that material relevant to children cases should be disclosed. The irreconcilable conflict was between the rights of the third party and the rights of the parties to the proceedings. The Court described the approach to be taken in assessing the Art 3 compliance of actions which followed on from court orders. The Court rejected the option of a closed material procedure. The Court described a step by step procedure which could be followed to provide procedural safeguards for witnesses. The article ends with the authors' explanation of the position of judges who have read material which is not to be disclosed to all the parties.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from