Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
View all articles
Authors

The developments in section 38(6) directions and instruction of experts

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Slug : Mahmood-DecFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 100985

Safda Mahmood

Local Authority Solicitor:

This article considers the challenges facing those who seek a direction under s 38(6) Children Act 1989, so as to seek a further assessment, involving predominantly the child.

There is a consideration of the factors to be satisfied, as well as the practicalities of seeking viability assessments and timing of assessments. The major case law is considered and in particular, the need to take a holistic approach to evidence before the court.  

There is a particular discussion of the revised Practice Direction 25A (Experts and Assessors in Family Proceedings) which accompanies the Family Procedure Rules 2010, and the position with the costs of the assessment, pursuant to the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No 2) Order 2011, which sets out amongst other things, the details as to rates of payment of expert services.

There is also consideration of the recent High Court authority surrounding the position with the payment of expert fees in children proceedings, namely, the case of A Local Authority v DS, DI and DS (Through a Children's Guardian) [2012] EWHC 1442 (Fam), [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), whereby the President of the Family Division, Sir Nicolas Wall, has set out some very useful guidance in relation to what should be set out in court directions, and subsequently in the letter of instruction.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from