Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

The developments in section 38(6) directions and instruction of experts

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Slug : Mahmood-DecFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 13, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 100985

Safda Mahmood

Local Authority Solicitor:

This article considers the challenges facing those who seek a direction under s 38(6) Children Act 1989, so as to seek a further assessment, involving predominantly the child.

There is a consideration of the factors to be satisfied, as well as the practicalities of seeking viability assessments and timing of assessments. The major case law is considered and in particular, the need to take a holistic approach to evidence before the court.  

There is a particular discussion of the revised Practice Direction 25A (Experts and Assessors in Family Proceedings) which accompanies the Family Procedure Rules 2010, and the position with the costs of the assessment, pursuant to the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No 2) Order 2011, which sets out amongst other things, the details as to rates of payment of expert services.

There is also consideration of the recent High Court authority surrounding the position with the payment of expert fees in children proceedings, namely, the case of A Local Authority v DS, DI and DS (Through a Children's Guardian) [2012] EWHC 1442 (Fam), [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), whereby the President of the Family Division, Sir Nicolas Wall, has set out some very useful guidance in relation to what should be set out in court directions, and subsequently in the letter of instruction.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from