Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
CB v EB [2020] EWFC 72
(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 November 2020)Financial Remedies – Consent order – Application for set aside – Property values left husband with lower sums than anticipated – FPR...
No right (as yet) to be married legally in a humanist ceremony: R (on the application of Harrison and others) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin)
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow, Harvard Law School, Visiting Professor in Family Law, University of BuckinghamIn July 2020, six humanist couples brought an application for judicial review on the...
Controlling and coercive behaviour is gender and colour blind but how are courts meeting the challenge to protect victims
Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Roma families face disadvantage in child protection proceedings
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
The ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’ – obligations and scope for change
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
View all articles
Authors

Families from Eastern Europe and care proceedings

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Maclean-FebFLJ2014-183
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 20, 2014, 02:15 AM
Article ID : 104517

Joanne PorterBarrister, Stour Chambers:

Following the controversy at the end of 2012 regarding the perceived "forced adoption" of Slovak Roma children in the UK, guidance has been provided by the higher courts dealing with care proceedings involving children and families from other jurisdictions. Eastern European families' involvement within the UK care system raises some very clear issues. In the event that the children and families have experienced significant deprivation in their country of origin or a very different cultural background to the norm in the UK, applying the threshold criteria on the object test of the "reasonable parent" can raise some interesting questions. Similarly, looking at the long term plans for the children raises additional dilemmas.

Cultural considerations are acknowledged within the welfare checklist as something that must be considered by the court when looking at the long term plans for children. So where does this fit in when children and families have come from a very different socio-economic and cultural background? This article considers the growing number of care proceedings involving Eastern European families, the jurisdiction of the UK courts and the issues of threshold and welfare determination.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from