Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles

Lords debate reforming divorce laws

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : Lords19102010
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 19, 2010, 10:35 AM
Article ID : 91953

ParliamentOn Monday evening the House of Lords debated reforming the laws governing divorce, including prenuptial contracts and no-fault divorce.

The debate was tabled by Baroness Ruth Deech who has commented extensively on the issue of reforming matrimonial law since she gave a series of six lectures on family law at Gresham College last year.

Former legal aid minister, Lord Bach said that by the time he had left his post that he had become convinced "that there was need for reform, and considerable reform, of our system of divorce in this country".

Speaking in favour of introducing compulsory mediation before legal aid is granted in matrimonial disputes, Lord Bach said that although we should be proud of our criminal law system, when it came to the "sensitive field of family disputes, is it really to be argued that confrontations in court should be the rule, rather than the exception?"

"However, there is - I have heard lawyers say this themselves - a belief that some lawyers in the industry have from time to time merely paid lip service to the option of mediation. In some ways, one cannot blame them because the incentive is to keep the case going," Lord Bach added.

Despite the fact that many of the issues discussed may be resolved tomorrow when the Supreme Court hands down its decision in Radmacher v Granatino, the Lords debated the benefits of prenuptial agreements becoming legally binding.

Lord Bishop of Blackburn was the only peer to speak against prenuptial agreements saying: "Such settlements, no doubt much loved by legal and financial professionals who profit from them, are in danger of reducing marriage to the economic bargaining of historic marriage contracts and of cheapening sacred commitments into balance sheets. Let us override cynicism with Christian realism. Of course we encounter a strong objection to the tenor of such requested legislation, for in a Christian understanding of marriage such prenuptials weaken and dilute our marriage vows of lifelong commitment, where sacrificial love forms the bedrock and the core."

Baroness Deech responded by pointing out that prenuptial contracts are common in many Catholic countries in Europe where the divorce rates are much lower than England and Wales.

Responding to the motion on behalf of the Government, Lord McNally said the Government will await the outcome of the Family Justice Review before making any decisions on comprehensive divorce law reform. It will also consider the Supreme Court's finding on prenuptial agreements carefully and the subsequent recommendations from the Law Commission.

He concluded: "We hope that, in 2011, those findings and studies will come together, which may be an opportune time to look at a range of reforms to our divorce law, so that it meets real needs and many of the criticisms that have been voiced today."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from