Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Parents with learning disabilities: the concept of ‘substituted parenting’ and its use in the family court context
Beth Tarleton, Senior Lecturer, University of BristolNadine Tilbury, Policy Officer for the Working Together with Parents Network (wtpn.co.uk) Over recent years, the term ‘substituted...
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, Consultant/Mediator, Anthony Gold SolicitorsA Rebooted Part 3 in force on 29 April 2024 The Part 3 rules have been reworked to make sure non-court dispute resolution ('NCDR') options...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent
The Children’s Commissioner has written a blog called "Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children: record numbers arriving once again in Kent".She says: "My unique responsibility as Children’s...
View all articles
Authors

Mind the gap: parent education programmes and the family justice system [2012] CFLQ 428

Sep 29, 2018, 18:35 PM
Title : Mind the gap: parent education programmes and the family justice system [2012] CFLQ 428
Slug : LeanneSmith2012CFLQ428
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 27, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 101235

Keywords: parenting disputes; conflict; PIP; contact; parent education programme; family justice

A recent evaluation of the Separated Parent Information Programme (PIP), the first nationally-available court-ordered parent education programme to be used in the UK in private law cases, found that the programme has a limited impact on the amount of contact taking place but no discernable impact on the levels of conflict between parents. In this article, two of the researchers involved in the evaluation explore the significance of the findings by examining them in the light of psychological research and in the context of general trends in the family justice system. The article notes that there is a significant gap between the needs of families in conflict and the ability of the PIP to address them. It is argued that this gap can be attributed to certain systemic, longstanding trends in the delivery of family justice which, unless addressed, will continue to stymie progress towards better outcomes for children.

To log on to Child and Family Law Quarterly Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from