Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles
Authors

Baby P's Serious Case Reviews: Some Legal Lessons

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : LYNNDAVIS-JanFLJ2011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 3, 2011, 09:17 AM
Article ID : 95107

The sorry saga leading to the failure to prevent Peter Connelly's dreadful death in August 2007 is now depressingly familiar. It is recounted in detail in the two Serious Case Review (SCR) overview reports released by the government on 26 October 2010 in line with its policy requiring publication of full SCR reports. The first SCR (November 2008) was judged inadequate and a second review (under different chairmanship) was ordered. This reported in February 2009 and was judged by Ofsted to be ‘good'. In all the analysis and agonising over what went wrong the focus remains squarely on issues of social work and medical practice compounded by the classic problem of poor inter-agency communication but some significant legal aspects to the case appear to be largely overlooked.

To read the rest of this article, see January [2011] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from