Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
LSC allocates same number of matter starts as last year
Sep 29, 2018, 17:39 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jan 21, 2011, 08:32 AM
Article ID :93391
The Legal Services Commission has announced that schedules for the period January to November 2011 will allow family legal aid providers to undertake the same level of work as has previously been undertaken.
Schedules for family legal aid providers will be based on their individual historic usage of new matter starts. This means that overall the LSC will allocate the same number of new matter starts as were used by providers last year - 269,000 in total.
The LSC said that the 100% award was made after consultation with representative bodies to give family legal aid providers certainty regarding their workflow for the months ahead.
In November last year, the LSC announced the extension family and combined family/housing legal aid contracts until midnight on 30 November 2011.
Looking beyond November, the LSC is awaiting the outcome of Ministry of Justice's Legal Aid Reform consultation in order to inform next steps in relation to family contracts. However, whilst there is some provision to extend contracts further beyond 30 November 2011, this provision is limited and as such, the LSC says it is "highly likely" that they will be retendering for family services within the next year.
In September last year the Law Society successfully applied to the High Court to quash the outcome of the family tender round for new legal aid contracts. The Law Society brought the judicial review after the tender round of family contracts cut the number of firms able to do legal aid work by 46%.
The High Court ruled that the LSC it breached procurement law by failing to give advance notice of the requirement for panel membership. The court quashed the contracts in four categories of practice: family; housing and family; children only; and child abduction.