Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Judicial independence and the restructuring of family courts and their support services [2012] CFLQ 333

Sep 29, 2018, 18:27 PM
Slug : JulieDoughty2012CFLQ333
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 21, 2012, 04:25 AM
Article ID : 100365

Following the Family Justice Review and the government’s response to it, this article examines proposals for restructuring the family justice system with a new unified Family Court for England and Wales. The reforms raise questions about the principle of judicial independence and separation of powers in the operation of the new court. First, the proposals envisage a stronger leadership role for the judiciary in order to fulfil the aim of reducing current long delays in cases deciding children’s future care. This role will require the judiciary to head teams reliant on multidisciplinary work between themselves, court staff, welfare support services and mediators. Policies to remove legal aid and divert many more parents to mediation mean that mediators’ current functions will soon be extended. We argue that all these support services should therefore be recognised as associated with the judicial function. Secondly, the reforms are to be implemented through a new system headed by a Family Justice Board, although the court service and the judiciary are already operating a Family Business Authority and have produced proposals for the modernisation of family justice. There is therefore potential for confusion as to the remit of these bodies and the extent to which responsibility for family justice lies with the executive or judiciary. This will need to be clarified if the Family Court is to operate effectively.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from