Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
A seismic change in ethos and practice
Caroline Bowden, a member of the Private Family Law Early Resolution Working Group which first examined what changes were needed, looks at the effect of the revised rules on everyone working in family...
Debunking the myth about sensitivity in drug and alcohol testing
*** SPONSORED CONTENT***With all the news about deep fakes, authentication and transparency in the news at the moment, Cansford Laboratories Reporting Scientist Jayne Hazon has examined a recent...
New Family Presiding Judges Appointed
The Lady Chief Justice, with the concurrence of the Lord Chancellor, has announced the appointment of two Family Presiding Judges.Mr Justice MacDonald has been appointed for a period of four years,...
Victims given greater access to justice through legal aid reform
Innocent people who have suffered miscarriages of justice, personal harm or injury are among those who will benefit from upcoming changes to legal aid means testing coming into effect this...
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
View all articles
Authors

Judicial independence and the restructuring of family courts and their support services [2012] CFLQ 333

Sep 29, 2018, 18:27 PM
Title : Judicial independence and the restructuring of family courts and their support services [2012] CFLQ 333
Slug : JulieDoughty2012CFLQ333
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 21, 2012, 04:25 AM
Article ID : 100365

Following the Family Justice Review and the government’s response to it, this article examines proposals for restructuring the family justice system with a new unified Family Court for England and Wales. The reforms raise questions about the principle of judicial independence and separation of powers in the operation of the new court. First, the proposals envisage a stronger leadership role for the judiciary in order to fulfil the aim of reducing current long delays in cases deciding children’s future care. This role will require the judiciary to head teams reliant on multidisciplinary work between themselves, court staff, welfare support services and mediators. Policies to remove legal aid and divert many more parents to mediation mean that mediators’ current functions will soon be extended. We argue that all these support services should therefore be recognised as associated with the judicial function. Secondly, the reforms are to be implemented through a new system headed by a Family Justice Board, although the court service and the judiciary are already operating a Family Business Authority and have produced proposals for the modernisation of family justice. There is therefore potential for confusion as to the remit of these bodies and the extent to which responsibility for family justice lies with the executive or judiciary. This will need to be clarified if the Family Court is to operate effectively.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from