Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

When exceptional is the rule: mental health, family problems and the reform of legal aid in England and Wales [2012] CFLQ 320

Sep 29, 2018, 18:27 PM
Slug : JoMiles2012CFLQ320
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Sep 21, 2012, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 100363

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 will from April 2013 remove legal aid from many areas of private family law, with many vulnerable individuals expected to represent themselves. However, funding will be available via the Act’s ‘exceptional funding’ regime on a case by case basis where provision of legal aid is necessary to avoid what would otherwise be a breach (or risk of a breach) of the person’s rights under the ECHR. Article 6 ECHR protects a right to legal aid in civil proceedings where necessary to ensure ‘practical and effective’ access to court. One factor that might inhibit individuals’ ability to represent themselves ‘properly and satisfactorily’ and so impede ‘practical and effective’ access is mental health. This paper examines data from the Civil and Social Justice Survey (CSJS) which casts light on the prevalence of mental health problems amongst adults with family law problems and so on the potential extent of eligibility for exceptional funding. We find that the prevalence of mental health problems in this population is rather higher than the government’s projections of take-up of exceptional funding might suggest, raising the potential for a somewhat higher than anticipated proportion of family disputants seeking exceptional funding on this basis.

Categories :
  • Articles
  • CFLQ
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from