Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Jo Edwards, Resolution’s Vice Chair: Petrodel v Prest

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal by Yasmin Prest and declared that property owned by the husband's companies are held on a resulting trust.
Slug : Jo-Edwards-Resolution-Petrodel-v-Prest-120613-951
Meta Title : Jo Edwards, Resolution’s Vice Chair: Petrodel v Prest
Meta Keywords : Divorce, financial remedy, prest
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 12, 2013, 05:25 AM
Article ID : 102841

This landmark ruling provides some degree of clarity into the often-debated points around the corporate veil, although the devil is, as always, in the detail.
 
Although they have upheld the original High Court ruling, in the judgments offered, the Supreme Court has effectively said that any spouse with significant wealth can tie up their assets in a business to protect themselves in the event of marital breakdown. This could give the economically powerful even more power during the divorce process and lead to greater financial imbalance in many post-separation outcomes.
 
On the other hand, the Supreme Court has upheld the rule of law, providing some certainty in relation to company law structures and how they interact with family law issues.
 
There are therefore potentially far-reaching implications for family law, and Resolution will be providing training for our members over the coming months to explore these implications in more detail.
 
It is also worth noting that the couple have four children under 17, a fact which has often been overlooked in coverage of the case. Whether you're dealing with assets of £37m, £37,000, or no assets at all, it's vital to ensure that the emotional and financial needs of the children come first. That's the approach Resolution's members take, it is enshrined in our Code of Practice, and whatever the impact of this judgment, something they will continue to advocate to their clients.
 
It is therefore encouraging - and perhaps surprising - to note that the Supreme Court has been able to uphold the justice of the case by making findings of fact in Mrs Prest's favour, enabling her to enforce the orders originally made by Mr Justice Moylan.

Jo Edwards is a Partner, Collaborative Lawyer and Mediator at Manches LLP and is qualified to undertake direct consultation with children. She is Vice Chair at Resolution and Chair, Resolution ADR committee at Resolution.

The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from