Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Jo Edwards, Resolution’s Vice Chair: Petrodel v Prest

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal by Yasmin Prest and declared that property owned by the husband's companies are held on a resulting trust.
Slug : Jo-Edwards-Resolution-Petrodel-v-Prest-120613-951
Meta Title : Jo Edwards, Resolution’s Vice Chair: Petrodel v Prest
Meta Keywords : Divorce, financial remedy, prest
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 12, 2013, 05:25 AM
Article ID : 102841

This landmark ruling provides some degree of clarity into the often-debated points around the corporate veil, although the devil is, as always, in the detail.
 
Although they have upheld the original High Court ruling, in the judgments offered, the Supreme Court has effectively said that any spouse with significant wealth can tie up their assets in a business to protect themselves in the event of marital breakdown. This could give the economically powerful even more power during the divorce process and lead to greater financial imbalance in many post-separation outcomes.
 
On the other hand, the Supreme Court has upheld the rule of law, providing some certainty in relation to company law structures and how they interact with family law issues.
 
There are therefore potentially far-reaching implications for family law, and Resolution will be providing training for our members over the coming months to explore these implications in more detail.
 
It is also worth noting that the couple have four children under 17, a fact which has often been overlooked in coverage of the case. Whether you're dealing with assets of £37m, £37,000, or no assets at all, it's vital to ensure that the emotional and financial needs of the children come first. That's the approach Resolution's members take, it is enshrined in our Code of Practice, and whatever the impact of this judgment, something they will continue to advocate to their clients.
 
It is therefore encouraging - and perhaps surprising - to note that the Supreme Court has been able to uphold the justice of the case by making findings of fact in Mrs Prest's favour, enabling her to enforce the orders originally made by Mr Justice Moylan.

Jo Edwards is a Partner, Collaborative Lawyer and Mediator at Manches LLP and is qualified to undertake direct consultation with children. She is Vice Chair at Resolution and Chair, Resolution ADR committee at Resolution.

The views expressed by contributing authors are not necessarily those of Family Law or Jordan Publishing and should not be considered as legal advice.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from