Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

WARDSHIP/CONTACT: JK v KC

Sep 29, 2018, 18:24 PM
Slug : JKvKC100311
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 15, 2011, 10:31 AM
Article ID : 95035

(Family Division; Parker J; 10 March 2011)

The Polish mother and American father met and married in New York then moved to Poland where their children were born. They then moved to England where the mother, father and mother's elder child by different relationship were all arrested on suspicion of murder. The children were placed in local authority care. The father was released without charge but the mother was subsequently convicted and sentenced to a minimum of 20 years imprisonment and was appealing. The father removed the children to the USA, the mother said without her consent and made an application under the Hague Convention. At issue was the jurisdiction of the English Court.

The English Court had jurisdiction under FLA 1986 in relation to two children taken to the USA by their father three years earlier. The children were habitually resident when the mother's application was made. Habitual residence could not be changed unilaterally. Even if the children's habitual residence had now changed, the English court still had jurisdiction. 

 

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from