Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Fact-finding hearings and the implementation of Practice Direction 12J

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Slug : Hunter-FLJApril2013-431
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 28, 2013, 06:20 AM
Article ID : 101951

Professor Rosemary Hunter

University of Kent

Adrienne Parnett

Barrister:

This article presents a summary of a recent report on the findings of a national online survey of judicial officers and practitioners commissioned by the Family Justice Council to monitor the operation of the President's Practice Direction 12J, which applies to proceedings concerning contact and residence orders where allegations of domestic violence are made.  The research results suggest that the Practice Direction is not operating in the way it was intended to do, in that the perceived relevance of domestic violence to contact and residence orders is being narrowed beyond the terms of the Practice Direction and the Guidance on Split Hearings, so that allegations of domestic violence tend to be minimised or disregarded. This has resulted in the holding of fact-finding hearings being unduly restricted, and findings or admissions not being given sufficient weight or followed through in orders made. The implementation of the Practice Direction is also hampered by severe resource limitations. The suggestions for improvement offered in the report are made on the basis that it is important to have a system that operates as effectively as possible within resource constraints, rather than one which adapts dysfunctionally to resource limitations by attempting to minimise the relevance of domestic violence.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from