Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

The variability of lump sum orders

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : Horton-AprilFLJ2013-411
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 2, 2013, 04:00 AM
Article ID : 102015

Michael Horton

Barrister, Coram Chambers:

Can the court ever vary the total amount payable under an order for a lump sum payable by instalments?

A divorce settlement involves the payment of money over time.  The payee may be keen to have this drafted as an order for 'lump sums' to ensure certainty of entitlement to the money (s)he bargained to receive.   The forthcoming case of Hamilton ([2013] EWCA Civ 13, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), in which the Court of Appeal heard argument on 6 December 2012, may shed some light on whether, and in what circumstances, the parties can ask the court to make such orders.

This article seeks to look at one of the reasons why orders for lump sums are sought.  Such orders cannot be varied as to either quantum or timing.  The alternative, an order for a lump sum payable by instalments, can be varied.  Of course, the court can vary the timing of instalments, and the arrangements for security.  The existing case law suggests the court can also vary the total quantum payable, invariably by writing off unpaid instalments that the payer can no longer afford.  This article seeks to argue the existing case law is wrong, and that the total payable under a lump sum payable by instalments should never be varied.  A clean break should be a clean break.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from