Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

The variability of lump sum orders

Sep 29, 2018, 21:03 PM
Slug : Horton-AprilFLJ2013-411
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 2, 2013, 04:00 AM
Article ID : 102015

Michael Horton

Barrister, Coram Chambers:

Can the court ever vary the total amount payable under an order for a lump sum payable by instalments?

A divorce settlement involves the payment of money over time.  The payee may be keen to have this drafted as an order for 'lump sums' to ensure certainty of entitlement to the money (s)he bargained to receive.   The forthcoming case of Hamilton ([2013] EWCA Civ 13, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), in which the Court of Appeal heard argument on 6 December 2012, may shed some light on whether, and in what circumstances, the parties can ask the court to make such orders.

This article seeks to look at one of the reasons why orders for lump sums are sought.  Such orders cannot be varied as to either quantum or timing.  The alternative, an order for a lump sum payable by instalments, can be varied.  Of course, the court can vary the timing of instalments, and the arrangements for security.  The existing case law suggests the court can also vary the total quantum payable, invariably by writing off unpaid instalments that the payer can no longer afford.  This article seeks to argue the existing case law is wrong, and that the total payable under a lump sum payable by instalments should never be varied.  A clean break should be a clean break.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from