Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles

Young Lawyers - Hannah Budd: The Social Network and Family Law

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : HannahBudd29062011-652
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 29, 2011, 11:34 AM
Article ID : 95133

Hannah BuddFor months now the news has been dominated by the furore surrounding super injunctions. As well as keeping us guessing as to the identities of the celebrities involved it has also brought home to all the huge impact of social networking sites in our society. They have the power to break High Court orders. It is almost hard to believe that Facebook is just 7 years old and Twitter just 5.

Given the very real part that social networking plays in the daily lives of so many young (and not so young) people it is unsurprising that as family lawyers it is something our clients talk to us about more and more often.

It is almost commonplace now at initial client meetings for clients to raise matters relating to their partners comings and goings online. It appears that these days ending a "relationship" on Facebook is almost as significant, and certainly a more public statement, than an absent wedding ring. It was also unsurprising to read a report recently that a survey by Divorce Online of over 200 petitions issued by women in the first four months of this year, 15 per cent of them cited their husband's excessive computer use as particular of unreasonable behaviour.

From citing as unreasonable behaviour, to proving adultery and co-habitation this change is something that we as practitioners must embrace.

Politically we continue to be some way off no fault divorce, but in the meantime thank goodness for Facebook levelling the litigation field!

Hannah Budd is an Assistant Solicitor at The International Family Law Group LLP. She specialises in complex ancillary relief cases often with an international element.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from