Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re A, B and C (Children) [2021] EWCA Civ 451
(Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Macur, Baker, Arnold LJJ, 01 April 2021)Public Law Children – Fact finding – Lucas Direction – Sexual abuse allegations – Judge found...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
HMCTS launches updated online court and tribunal finder
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has launched an updated version of its online court and tribunal finder tool to help those in search of a court, its location, opening times, disabled access...
NFJO publishes report on supervision orders in care proceedings
The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) has published a report following its survey into the use of supervision orders in care proceedings. The survey focused on...
Villiers - the Anglo/Scottish perspective
Heard by the Supreme Court in December 2019, with its judgment last July, this case attracted much interest (or “lurid publicity” as per Mr Justice Mostyn in his judgement this week) as it...
View all articles
Authors

Young Lawyers - Hannah Budd: Are prenups relevant to the rest of us?

Sep 29, 2018, 18:14 PM
Slug : HannahBudd14042011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 14, 2011, 11:45 AM
Article ID : 94553

This is the first piece for a new opinion column written by young family lawyers. For more information, click here.

Hannah BuddEven before the Supreme Court decision last October in Radmacher, the debate surrounding the status of marital agreements has dominated lectures, seminars, periodicals and general small talk at networking events. As the Law Commissions Consultation closes I can't help but wonder if I am alone in struggling to get enthusiastic about the issue.

Don't get me wrong, I am as interested as any in the Law Commissions recommendations but there is a large part of me that thinks that this is an area which lacks relevance to all but the smallest minority, and especially so with those of my generation.

The reality is that now, except where there is very generous assistance from the Bank of Mum and Dad, most of us leave university and Law School with significant student debts which we are paying off long into our early years of qualification: a situation which will only be exacerbated for future generations following the forthcoming changes in university tuition fees. This, coupled with the very real difficulties for first time buyers getting on the property ladder, means that for most of my contemporaries marrying in their late twenties or early thirties there are few, if any, assets to protect at the time of marriage. 

I fully appreciate that there are many circumstances in which a pre-nuptial agreement, and certainty as to the effect of them, is absolutely invaluable. For example those who have inherited or been gifted significant sums from parents, or will do so, but the reality is that these individuals will always buck the trend.

So what would engage me? In a society where pre marital cohabitation is generally accepted as the cultural norm I can't help but feel that under the existing law many injustices are done. Will there be reform? My concern is that in a society in which marriage is still actively promoted it is simply too politically sensitive.

Hannah Budd is an Assistant Solicitor at The International Family Law Group LLP. She specialises in complex ancillary relief cases often with an international element.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from