Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Seven new states ratify Hague Convention on protection of children
Sep 29, 2018, 17:36 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Nov 23, 2010, 09:50 AM
Article ID :93063
Seven additional Member States have ratified the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children.
The Convention ensures international recognition and enforcement of custody and visitation orders, complements and reinforces the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, and contains provisions addressing cooperation on key issues such as runaway children and the cross-border placement of children in foster families or institutional care.
The Convention was ratified on Friday by Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Romania and Spain. Finland also deposited its instrument of acceptance to the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the International Protection of Adults.
It follows the signing of the Convention last month by the United States of America. The US also recently approved the Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance.
In May the US Supreme court upheld the authority of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in a test case in which it ruled a father seeking the return of his son from Chile had a right of custody.