Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Following the case of Hamilton v Hamilton  EWCA Civ 13,  1 FLR (forthcoming), this article explores the developments in the law relating to, on the one hand, lump sums and, on the other, lump sums by instalments and the impact of such developments for family law practitioners and, always more importantly, the clients.
There is a whistle-stop tour through the case law. For example, right back in 1973, the Court of Appeal in Coleman v Coleman  Fam. 10, made it clear that while the court had the power to make an order for more than one lump sum payment (lump sums) within an order, there could only be one order. This is followed by a review of the Court's powers to vary lump sums by instalments and asks if this power extends to quantum as well as timing.
In Hamilton, Mrs Justice Baron gave some helpful drafting guidelines, but this article advises caution - the guidelines might fit most cases, but there is not always a 'one size fits all' solution and consideration must be given to the facts of any particular case.
This article offers practical advice on how to approach this thorny issue of lump sums and lump sums by instalments.
The full version of this article appears in the July 2013 issue of Family Law.