Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re P (Circumcision: Child in Care) [2021] EWHC 1616 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2021)Parental Responsibility – Circumcision – 21-month-old Muslim child – Raised in non-Muslim household of extended family – Mother sought...
R (Care Proceedings Joinder of Foster Carers) [2021] EWCA Civ 875
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Baker, Carr, Lewis LJJ, 15 June 2021)Practice and Procedure – Care proceedings – Foster carers joined as party to care proceedings – AppealThe...
The family court’s role in micro managing ‘trivial’ disputes
Sarah Higgins, Partner, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe decision in Re (B) (a child) (Unnecessary Private Law Applications) [2020] EWFC B44 dealt with the family court’s role in micro...
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
View all articles
Authors

Lump sum, Lump sums and Instalments: a brief history

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Slug : Groarke-JulyFLJ2013-856
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 20, 2013, 02:00 AM
Article ID : 102867

Nathaniel Groarke

Associate Solicitor, Withers LLP

Following the case of Hamilton v Hamilton [2013] EWCA Civ 13, [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), this article explores the developments in the law relating to, on the one hand, lump sums and, on the other, lump sums by instalments and the impact of such developments for family law practitioners and, always more importantly, the clients.  

There is a whistle-stop tour through the case law.  For example, right back in 1973, the Court of Appeal in Coleman v Coleman [1973] Fam. 10, made it clear that while the court had the power to make an order for more than one lump sum payment (lump sums) within an order, there could only be one order. This is followed by a review of the Court's powers to vary lump sums by instalments and asks if this power extends to quantum as well as timing.

In Hamilton, Mrs Justice Baron gave some helpful drafting guidelines, but this article advises caution - the guidelines might fit most cases, but there is not always a 'one size fits all' solution and consideration must be given to the facts of any particular case. 

This article offers practical advice on how to approach this thorny issue of lump sums and lump sums by instalments.

The full version of this article appears in the July 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from