Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Foreign Lands: Part 2: Hello immigration control, can you hear me?

Sep 29, 2018, 21:01 PM
Slug : Geddes-MarchFLJ2013
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 27, 2013, 03:40 AM
Article ID : 101753

Gillian Geddes

Barrister, 2-3 Hind Court:    

Historically, immigration law practitioners have faced difficulties trying to communicate effectively with the UK BA (formerly the Home Office) on behalf of their clients.  For non-immigration law practitioners who have clients subject to immigration control, these communications can seem even more perplexing, particularly as the UK BA's terminology can baffle those not accustomed to it.  Would you be comfortable knowing your client is 'on TA' and subject to 'NAM'?  Would you be happy with your client having 'LOTR'?  Or worse, having 'RDs'?  To some it might seem that the UK BA has cornered the market in the use of acronyms, and its terminology can confuse practitioners, changing and adapting as it does with the passage of time and the introduction of new processes and legislation.  This article, the second in the series, 'Foreign Lands', explores this rather strange language and offers an insight and understanding for family practitioners into the UK BA's most commonly-encountered expressions, and hopefully a way through the maze.

The full version of this article appears in the March 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from