Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Secure accommodation and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Farquharson-FebFLJ2014-195
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 02:04 AM
Article ID : 104527

Jo Farquharson and Gail Hadley, Barristers, Colleton Chambers, Exeter

Susan Campbell QC, Pump Court Chambers, London

Does the High Court have the power under its inherent jurisdiction to authorize the detention of a young person in secure accommodation where that person cannot be secured under section 25 of the Children Act 1989?

Where statute does not cover that young person's circumstances permitting a section 25 order, but the High Court considers she should be secured in her own best interests, can the High Court authorize secure accommodation notwithstanding the lack of statutory power? Just how far-reaching are the "theoretically limitless" powers of the High Court once a young person has become a Ward of Court? Three barristers from the Western Circuit encountered this problem recently in the High Court in Bristol, and write about their experience in a joint article.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from