Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
View all articles
Authors

Secure accommodation and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Slug : Farquharson-FebFLJ2014-195
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 02:04 AM
Article ID : 104527

Jo Farquharson and Gail Hadley, Barristers, Colleton Chambers, Exeter

Susan Campbell QC, Pump Court Chambers, London

Does the High Court have the power under its inherent jurisdiction to authorize the detention of a young person in secure accommodation where that person cannot be secured under section 25 of the Children Act 1989?

Where statute does not cover that young person's circumstances permitting a section 25 order, but the High Court considers she should be secured in her own best interests, can the High Court authorize secure accommodation notwithstanding the lack of statutory power? Just how far-reaching are the "theoretically limitless" powers of the High Court once a young person has become a Ward of Court? Three barristers from the Western Circuit encountered this problem recently in the High Court in Bristol, and write about their experience in a joint article.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from