Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Book Review on Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents (8th Edition)
It is 27 years since Denzil Lush first produced this book, some subsequent editions of which one has had the pleasure of reviewing for Family Law, and which, for some reason, does not figure as much...
Re AC (A Child) [2020] EWFC 90
(Family Court, Peel J, 11 December 2020)Private Law Children – s 8, Children Act 1989 – Inheritance - Jurisdiction Whether court had jurisdiction to authorise the mother to accept the...
Second reading in the House of Lords of the Domestic Abuse Bill
The Domestic Abuse Bill received its second reading in the House of Lords on 5 January 2021. The committee stage, where the bill will be scrutinised line-by-line, does not yet have a confirmed date....
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
How the care system should change - a child’s perspective
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new investigation into how children affected by the care system would like the current system to change ahead of the government’s planned...
View all articles

Family legal aid tender crisis

Sep 29, 2018, 17:30 PM
Slug : Family-legal-aid-crisis-120810
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 12, 2010, 09:00 AM
Article ID : 91285

Law SocietyThe Legal Services Commission (LSC) is facing strong criticism from the law society and practitioners for its handling of the recent tender round of family legal aid contracts.

The Law Society's chief executive, Des Hudson, wrote to the LSC last week after it emerged that almost half of the firms tendering for legal aid family contracts were turned down.

In his letter Mr Hudson called for a halt to the commencement of the new contracts which are due to start on 14 October. "We believe that the LSC should suspend the implementation of the tender round pending an urgent but thorough and public evaluation," he said.

The town of Poole in Dorset has a population of 140,000 people yet just one firm will now be able to offer family legal aid. It is just one of many "advice deserts" that the Law Society has identified.

Mr Hudson continued: "We understand that in east Cornwall one firm has been allocated all the matter starts which means that, in any case where more than one party is legally aided, the second will have to find a solicitor elsewhere in the county - probably more than an hour's drive away. We believe that the situation in Wales, in Northumberland and in Lincolnshire gives rise to similar concerns. We do not understand how this is consistent with the commission's duty to secure access to justice."

Colin Mitchell, a non-legal aid collaborative family law solicitor at Coles Miller's Poole office said: "There is a significant need for the public funding of family and welfare services in the Poole. If there remains only one or so legal aid lawyers in Poole, then demand will outstrip supply.

"There will be those who need prompt and proper legal advice but will not be able to get it. For example, in cases of domestic violence there is often the need for swift action with an injunction application. If help is not available via the family courts, then pressure could fall on the police. This will engage the criminal justice system which is more likely to inflame a difficult family situation rather than help. Action via the family courts with specialist family solicitors is geared to defuse and resolve problems for the long term, which the criminal courts simply can not do."

In London Anne-Marie Hutchinson, a family lawyer with an international reputation for her work in child abduction and forced marriage cases has also been refused a legal aid contract for her specialism.

She is appealing the LSC's decision, arguing that forced marriage and honour based violence cases should be given the same weight for the purposes of the LSC contract tender as other areas of family law. However if her appeal is unsuccessful she may be forced to move to another firm with her team.  

Ongoing cases will not be affected by the cutbacks as all providers can continue with those opened before the new contracts come into force on 14 October.

A spokesperson for the LSC said: "An insistence on ensuring quality advice where it is needed is at the heart of our tendering process. We are confident we have achieved quality advice provision throughout England and Wales."


Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from