Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
FLBA warns of consequences of civil legal aid cuts
Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Dec 14, 2010, 07:29 AM
Article ID :93273
Ahead of Justice Secretary, Kenneth Clarke's appearance before the Justice Select Committee tomorrow, the Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) has warned of the potentially dangerous consequences of the planned cuts to civil legal aid.
Stephen Cobb QC, FLBA Chair, has highlighted domestic violence and ‘section 37' cases as two particular areas of concern.
He said that although the FLBA is supportive of rational initiatives which help tackle the national debt, the government should fully consider all the consequences on people's lives before removing public funding for family law representation.
"The FLBA supports and encourages all initiatives - legislative and otherwise - to protect the victims of domestic violence," Mr Cobb said.
"However, under the Green Paper proposals, there will be an ‘inequality of arms' in cases involving domestic violence before the courts - where the alleged victim will be entitled to public funds, whereas the alleged perpetrator will not be so entitled. There is a real risk of a surge in the number of allegations, and possibly cross-allegations, of domestic violence in order to be able to qualify for public funds.
He added: "Equally worrying is in private law children cases, if a Judge considers that serious child protection issues arise such that the threshold for a care or supervision order with respect to the child may be satisfied, the court may direct the appropriate authority to undertake an investigation of the child's circumstances under section 37 of the Children Act 1989. Whilst this investigation takes place, an interim care order can be made. In effect, this means that parents could have their children removed, and because they would not be entitled to legal aid, they would go unrepresented."