Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles

In Defence of the Defence of Marital Coercion

Sep 29, 2018, 21:10 PM
Slug : Edwards-AugustFLJ2013-996
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 23, 2013, 01:55 AM
Article ID : 103149

Susan S M Edwards

Professor of Law, University of Buckingham, Door Tenant, 1 Gray's Inn Sq Chambers, London

Contrary to critics the criminal defence of marital coercion (Criminal Justice Act 1925, s 47) is not a relic which should be consigned to history but is of increasingly relevance to many wives, who, in our multicultural society with  its patterns of modern migration, find themselves sub virga viri sui. Family law by contrast has recognised the need to protect vulnerable women including men from forced marriage in the law on annulment (Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) 1973, s 12), and the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 makes threats and use of force a civil offence, providing  injunctive relief in the form of forced marriage protection orders and with a criminal provision coming into force.

Criminal law, with regard to the defence of duress has resiled, driven by a public policy need to confront gang culture, it becomes ever more difficult to establish duress for all including frail and fearful women. Baroness Hale in R v Hasan [2005] UKHL 22, tried valiantly to bring their predicament into the understanding of her colleagues in the House of Lords but they missed this opportunity to  consider her insightful concerns. Notwithstanding that the criminal law does recognise psychological duress where there is compulsion in circumstances of human trafficking, battered and/or  fearful women coerced into crime are left with but one champion in the Criminal Justice Act 1925, s 47. The criminal law should be taking urgent steps to develop the law to recognise that many wives and indeed cohabitees are under his thumb.

The full version of this article appears in the August 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from