Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

PATERNITY/ CHILD SUPPORT: Law v Inostroza Ahumada

Sep 29, 2018, 17:34 PM
Slug : EWCA1145
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 26, 2010, 11:32 AM
Article ID : 92239

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Stanley Burnton and Tomlinson LJJ; 6 October 2010)

CMEC sought to enforce child support arrears of £30,000. It obtained an enforcement order but when the arrears were still not paid, it obtained a charging order over the non-payer's property.  The non-payer did not appeal the assessment, the liability order or the charging order. A second set of enforcement proceedings were brought in respect of a subsequent period for about £13,000. The non-payer appealed, claiming he was not father. The child refused to take a DNA test, and the court found that the non-payer was the father, in absence of contradictory evidence. The non-payer neither appealed nor paid the child support and a liability order was made which he appealed. The order was set aside on a technicality and remitted to the justices and the amount was subsequently reduced. The non-payer commenced proceedings seeking a declaration that he was not the father, within s 55A of Family Law Act 1986. CMEC was joined as intervenor and gave an undertaking that it would not enforce the liability order save as to obtaining a second charging order. CMEC sought to strike the non-payer's petition out on the basis that there was no new evidence. The judge adjourned the matter, ordering a stay of enforcement until the next hearing. CMEC challenged the  judge's jurisdiction to make an order relating to separate enforcement proceedings.

Appeal allowed, the judge had no jurisdiction to control proceedings brought under a different statutory regime.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.

They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from