Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Help separated parents ditch avoidance strategies that stop them resolving differences
The desire to avoid conflict with an ex is the primary reason that separated parents do not get to see their children.  That’s an eye-opening finding from a survey of 1,105 separated...
What is a Cohabitation Agreement, and do I need one?
Many couples, despite living together, never seek to legally formalise their living and financial arrangements.  They mistakenly believe that the concept of a ‘common law’ husband and...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
View all articles
Authors

What's in a name? A practitioner's view on reform of residence orders

Sep 29, 2018, 18:14 PM
Slug : ChrisBevan-JulyFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 18, 2012, 05:49 AM
Article ID : 99185

Chris Bevan
Barrister, KCH Chambers

Family lawyers have given a somewhat cautious welcome to the Children and Families Bill announced on the 9 May 2012 as part of the Queen's Speech to Parliament. The Bill, which is expected to be introduced in early 2013, adopts many of the reforms proposed by the government in its response to last November's Family Justice Review. Significant proposals include a six-month statutory time limit for care cases; greater emphasis on mediation and the establishment of a ‘shared parenting' principle to ensure children have a relationship with both parents after family separation. The government published a consultation paper Co-operative Parenting Following Family Separation: Proposed Legislation on the Involvement of Both Parents in a Child's Life 13 June 2012 containing proposals on precisely how legislation is to be framed to achieve these ends.

My concern, doubtless echoed of my fellow practitioners, is how such measures are to be resourced and implemented in a family justice system that is facing such profound budget cuts. More pressingly, however, I question whether the Bill is a missed opportunity for important reform and this article argues that what is needed is a rethink as to the labels we attach to orders governing where a child is to live.

To read the rest of this article, see July [2012] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from