Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Obligations and responsibilities – the mosquito in the bedroom
Stephen Wildblood KC, 3PB BarristersLuke Nelson, 3PB BarristersWhatever happened to ‘obligations and responsibilities’ in s 25(2) MCA 1973?  Why is it that all of the other words in...
A rare order for a child in utero
Mary Welstead, CAP Fellow Harvard Law School; Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn 2023, Kettering NHS Trust applied for an anticipatory declaration for a child...
Stranded spouses: an overview
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4PB, author of A Practical Guide to Stranded Spouses in Family Law ProceedingsThis article provides an overview of the issues that often arise in cases...
Now is the time to reassess presumption f parental involvement in cases involving domestic abuse
Lea Levine, Paralegal at Stewarts and former independent domestic violence advisorIn this article, paralegal and former independent domestic violence advisor (“IDVA”) Lea Levine...
Hadkinson orders – applicability in financial remedy proceedings
Hassan Sarwar, Cornwall Street BarristersHassan Sarwar considers the development and usage of Hadkinson Orders in financial remedy proceedings.  The article provides a helpful overview of a...
View all articles
Authors

The Child Support Agency: the never ending story

Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Title : The Child Support Agency: the never ending story
Slug : Chapman-AugFLJ2012
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 7, 2012, 05:40 AM
Article ID : 99701

Kalvin P Chapman
Solicitor, Ashton Fox Solicitors Ltd

Since 1993 the Child Support Agency has been re-vamped four times. The changes still have not stopped following the recent Public Bodies Act 2011 abolishing the Commission and remitting the CSA back to the Department for Works and Pensions. Since 1993 the CSA, the Child Support Act 1991, together with the regulations, have all been challenged in one way or another in the courts. Most challenges fail. The CSA continues to fail parents. However, there is a recurring complaint raised by many practitioners, as well as the CSA customers themselves. That is that the CSA's employees, and therefore the CSA itself, is 'institutionally sexist' and applies the rules to men in a different, and harsher, way than it is applied to women. Male PWCs who were formerly NRPs find themselves unable to make progress, their applications are lost, applications are not accepted and appeals are ignored, whereas female PWCs do not face these difficulties. The author considers the possibility of a large group of men issuing a group litigation claim to challenge the CSA on the grounds that it is 'institutionally sexist' and, in many respects, is bias against men or would such a case fail, as most others have.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from