Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

JURISDICTION: Mercredi v Chaffe (Case C-497/10 PPU)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:03 PM
Slug : C49710PPU
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 4, 2011, 09:27 AM
Article ID : 93787

(First Chamber of Court of Europe; 22 December 2010)

The unmarried parents had been living together in England but separated immediately after the birth of their daughter in 2009. The French national mother removed the child to Reunion Island where she had been born. An order was made by an English court requiring child's return from unknown destination. The mother (in Reunion) began proceedings in France.

The European Court provided guidance following a preliminary reference request from the Court of Appeal. The concept of ‘habitual residence', for the purposes of Articles 8 and 10 BIIR corresponds to the place which reflects some degree of integration by the child in a social and family environment - an infant's situation will be determined by reference to those who care for him. Where one Member State is seised in relation to a child, a non-return order by another Member State will have no effect on orders yet to be made by the seised Member State.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from