Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL REMEDIES: B v B

Sep 29, 2018, 21:29 PM
Slug : BvB16012012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 29, 2012, 11:43 AM
Article ID : 97971

(Family Division; David Salter, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court; 16 January 2012)

The wife was 40, the husband was 61 and the marriage had lasted 15 years. The husband was a successful businessman working in commercial property with pre-marital wealth assessed at £823,362. The wife was unemployed, had no qualifications, only an income of £5,000 maintenance pending suit but wished to start her own business. The husband's pension was  £12,000 pa plus income from various businesses consisting of salary, dividends and benefits in kind. The wife assessed income needs at £6,395 pm and wished to return to the matrimonial home where the husband had been living since separation. The husband's assessment of his own needs at £1,655 pm, high standard of living during the marriage, wife made a full and significant contribution to the running of the husband's businesses. The £820,000 of pre-marital wealth excluded, a residual sum was sufficient to meet the wife's needs and do justice to the sharing principle. The husband was to remain in matrimonial home, the wife was awarded £600,000 to fund accommodation, £50,000 for a car, £50,000 for future unexpected expenditure, taking into account high standard of living, plus £1,349 to clear overdraft. The wife's income needs of £4,500, £853 net earning capacity, Duxbury fund of £1.04m. The husband was unable to prove the wife's cohabitation with a new partner to the extent that it would impact on the award. On needs and sharing principle, outcome the same, wife awarded 40.45% of total assets.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from