Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Restrictions on disclosure: public interest immunity and the rights of the parties: Re J
Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Dec 10, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID :100981
Re J (A Child: Disclosure)  EWCA Civ 1204,  1 FLR (forthcoming) revisited a variety of the recent case law on restriction - or not - of disclosure of information in the light of Human Rights Act 1998; and especially of the respective rights to privacy of a prospective witness in a case, and of the right to a fair trial of the child's parents and the child. Public interest immunity seems only peripherally to have been considered. The wider procedural and evidential issues arising from Re J fall to be considered alongside a principled assessment as to how the withholding procedure (FPR 2010, r 21.3) is to operate (the West London Pipeline case), who should see the restricted documents and whether public interest immunity applies. The article considers restrictions on disclosure on grounds of privacy and public interest immunity and asks whether two different procedures and sets of legal principle should apply to them, and a third for the withholding of evidence covered by privilege.