Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Gow v Grant leads the way towards financial rights for cohabitants

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Slug : Bray-DecFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Dec 7, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 100979

Judith Bray

Reader in Law, University of Buckingham:

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29 has refocused our attention on the contentious debate surrounding financial rights for cohabitants in England and Wales. The decision reversed the judgment of the Scottish appeal courts who had found against the appellant. Lady Hale took the opportunity in the course of her judgment to contrast Scottish and English law and criticised the Government in England and Wales for its failure to adopt recommendations made by the Law Commission in 2007 to give cohabitants the right to claim a financial remedy after relationship breakdown.  There has been frequent criticism from academics and practitioners on the Government's failure to grant cohabitant's such rights but the views of members of the judiciary have been less clear and support far more limited making this level of support from the Supreme Court highly significant. The case shows how differently a couple will be treated by the law on the breakdown of cohabitation in Scotland to that in England and Wales. There is much to reflect on for supporters of the introduction of legislation granting rights to cohabitants in England and Wales but should serve to allay many of the fears of its critics that cohabitants will be treated the same as divorcing couples and civil partners.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from