The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
Pensions on marital breakdown Part 3: case-law – what does it tell us?
Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Aug 2, 2012, 10:07 AM
Article ID :99657
Beverley Morris Partner/Solicitor, Collaborative Lawyer, Divorce and Family Law Practice LLP
George Mathieson Mathieson Consulting
In this article we consider what guidance we can take from reported decisions which have involved pension aspects of a settlement. Prior to legislative enactments, Brooks v Brooks  AC 375,  2 FLR 13 provided a partial solution where pensions were an issue but its usage was restricted. Brooks had involved an unusual pension scheme and turns on its own facts. The essential points about the pension were:
it was set up after the marriage, it was therefore clearly post-nuptial;
the husband was the only member of the scheme - no other beneficiary was involved;
the wife had earnings of her own from the company which supported a pension for her of the relevant amount.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here