Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

Pensions on marital breakdown Part 3: case-law – what does it tell us?

Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Slug : BeverleyMorris-AugFLJ2012
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 2, 2012, 10:07 AM
Article ID : 99657

Beverley Morris
Partner/Solicitor, Collaborative Lawyer, Divorce and Family Law Practice LLP

George Mathieson
Mathieson Consulting

In this article we consider what guidance we can take from reported decisions which have involved pension aspects of a settlement. Prior to legislative enactments, Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375, [1995] 2 FLR 13 provided a partial solution where pensions were an issue but its usage was restricted. Brooks had involved an unusual pension scheme and turns on its own facts. The essential points about the pension were:

  • it was set up after the marriage, it was therefore clearly post-nuptial;
  • the husband was the only member of the scheme - no other beneficiary was involved;
  • the wife had earnings of her own from the company which supported a pension for her of the relevant amount.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from