Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
The need for proportionality and the ‘Covid impact’
Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Local authority input into private law proceedings, part II
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
Time for change (II)
Lisa Parkinson, Family mediation trainer, co-founder and a Vice-President of the Family Mediators AssociationThe family law community needs to respond to the urgent call for change from the...
How Can I Wed Thee? – Let Me Change the Ways: the Law Commission’s Consultation Paper on ‘Weddings’ Law (2020)
Professor Chris Barton, A Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association, Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers, Stoke-on-TrentThis article considers the Paper's 91 Consultation Questions...
Consultation on the proposed transfer of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of costs to the Legal Aid Agency
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
View all articles
Authors

Outsourcing Justice on Family Breakdown: A Road to Consent Orders

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Slug : Barton-JulyFLJ2013-840
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 21, 2013, 02:00 AM
Article ID : 102861

Chris Barton,

Emeritus Professor of Family Law, a Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association and Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers

and

Grenville Jay,

Barrister, Regent Chambers

The authors consider  religious and civil arbitration as particular routes to consent orders, and the weights that the court may attach to them. They first discuss the lessons to be learnt from the recent case of AI v MT  [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam), and from previous published comment upon it, together with some disparate views expressed about Jewish and Muslim approaches to the matter. The discussion then turns to  the civil route, with reference to the Institute of Family Arbitrators and the "Edgar" (Edgar v Edgar [1980] 3 All ER 887) criteria.

They  note the apparent lack of published research on the respective fates of these routes to consent order applications, and suggest that the arbitral tribunal, the rules applied and the cultural context in which it operates will all have relevance, as AI v MT demonstrates, and that the test is a difficult one. The position of agreements relating to children is entirely different from that of financial remedies. There is no tried and tested mechanism for obtaining the imprimatur of a court order, and the facts on which a child's welfare is to be judged are not as easily established and expressed.

The full version of this article appears in the July 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from