Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles

Outsourcing Justice on Family Breakdown: A Road to Consent Orders

Sep 29, 2018, 21:08 PM
Slug : Barton-JulyFLJ2013-840
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 21, 2013, 02:00 AM
Article ID : 102861

Chris Barton,

Emeritus Professor of Family Law, a Vice-President of the Family Mediators Association and Academic Door Tenant, Regent Chambers


Grenville Jay,

Barrister, Regent Chambers

The authors consider  religious and civil arbitration as particular routes to consent orders, and the weights that the court may attach to them. They first discuss the lessons to be learnt from the recent case of AI v MT  [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam), and from previous published comment upon it, together with some disparate views expressed about Jewish and Muslim approaches to the matter. The discussion then turns to  the civil route, with reference to the Institute of Family Arbitrators and the "Edgar" (Edgar v Edgar [1980] 3 All ER 887) criteria.

They  note the apparent lack of published research on the respective fates of these routes to consent order applications, and suggest that the arbitral tribunal, the rules applied and the cultural context in which it operates will all have relevance, as AI v MT demonstrates, and that the test is a difficult one. The position of agreements relating to children is entirely different from that of financial remedies. There is no tried and tested mechanism for obtaining the imprimatur of a court order, and the facts on which a child's welfare is to be judged are not as easily established and expressed.

The full version of this article appears in the July 2013 issue of Family Law.   

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from