Simon Wilkinson, Parklane PlowdenThe Covid-19 pandemic has infiltrated every aspect of our lives. Within the courts and tribunals service there has been a plethora of guidance since March 2020 which...
Mani Singh Basi, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingsLucy Logan Green, Barrister, 4 Paper BuildingThis article considers the interplay between private and public law proceedings, focusing on the law relating...
The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation on the proposed transfer from Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service to the Legal Aid Agency of the assessment of all civil legal aid bills of...
Mapping Paths to Family Justice: a national picture of findings on out of court family dispute resolution
Sep 29, 2018, 21:01 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Mar 1, 2013, 00:30 AM
Article ID :101759
Anne Barlow, Rosemary Hunter, Janet Smithson, Jan Ewing, Kate Getliffe and Paulette Morris
Universities of Exeter and Kent:
This article sets out the preliminary findings from the completed national survey phase of a 3 year ESRC-funded empirical study, which aims to build an up-to-date picture of national awareness and patterns of experiences since 1996 of the three major forms of out of court Family Dispute Resolution currently available in England and Wales - Mediation, Solicitor Negotiation, and Collaborative Law. Whilst mediation was the best recognised of these forms of dispute resolution, the article considers why people who had used it were, in general, less satisfied with it than with those who had used the more partisan alternatives of either solicitor negotiation or collaborative law. The article also explores the reasons given for rejecting these different dispute resolution processes and highlights the high percentage of people who settle disputes without seeking legal advice at all. The aims of the further phases of the study are considered in the light of the changing family justice landscape following the Family Justice Review and Government Response.
The full version of this article appears in the March 2013 issue of Family Law.