Maryam Syed, 7BRExamining the most recent caselaw in both family and criminal law jurisdictions this article discusses the prominent and still newly emerging issue of controlling and coercive domestic...
Mary Marvel, Law for LifeWe have all become familiar with the discussion about structural racism in the UK, thanks to the excellent work of the Black Lives Matter movement. But it is less recognised...
Helen Brander, Pump Court ChambersQuite unusually, two judgments of the High Court in 2020 have considered financial provision for adult children and when and how applications can be made. They come...
Unknown unknowns and other necessary reasons to go to war (or instruct experts)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:35 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jan 2, 2013, 00:30 AM
Article ID :101225
Dr Joshua Carritt-Baker
When is an expert necessary in Family Court proceedings? It is clear it is not being suggested that experts are unnecessary in Family Court cases - but there remains an interesting question as to how and when it is determined that an expert is necessary. There are some complex (and perhaps slightly hidden) issues relating to the information-acquisition exercise in multifaceted family situations. What is it that is 'known' - and how sure are we about it? Are we clear about what we still need to find out? And, perhaps most importantly, what about the things we don't (yet) know we don't know - the 'unknown unknowns'?
Derided as Donald Rumsfeld's famous speech was in many quarters, it was in fact borrowing from a very clear and well-established set of ideas relating to our ability to understand what it is we know and don't know. With that in mind, I provide a number of clinical examples to illustrate the problems that can occur in this area when clinicians and clinical science are excluded from the decision-making process.
The full version of this article appears in the January 2013 issue of Family Law.