Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
The suspension, during lockdown, of prison visits for children: was it lawful?
Jake Richards, 9 Gough ChambersThis article argues that the suspension on prison visits during this period and the deficiency of measures to mitigate the impact of this on family life and to protect...
View all articles
Authors

Interim Care Orders: Is the Bar set too Low?

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : AndrewBainham-AprilFLJ2011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Apr 1, 2011, 12:19 PM
Article ID : 95143

Andrew Bainham

Barrister at 14 Gray's Inn Square, Fellow of Christ's College Cambridge

In ‘Removal of children at interim hearings: is the test now set too high?' published in April [2009] Fam Law 321, Darren Howe asked the pertinent question whether the test was now set too high for the removal of children at the interim stage of care proceedings. He instanced chronic neglect as a particular area of concern. I want to focus here on what might be viewed as the opposite problem; that interim care orders (hereafter ‘ICOs') are being made too readily by the lower courts and to highlight what, it may be argued, is a blurring of the distinction between voluntary co-operation and compulsory action. I will contend that some current practice is contrary to the philosophy of the Children Act 1989. I suggest a modest reform which might assist co-operation between parents and local authorities at the interim stage, based on a welfare determination, and which might avoid pushing at the boundaries of the interim threshold.

To read the rest of this article, see April [2011] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from