Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Financial Remedies and the Family Procedure Rules 2010

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : AlexanderChandler-MayFLJ2011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 2, 2011, 12:40 PM
Article ID : 95155

Alexander Chandler

Barrister, 1 Garden Court, Temple, London

The Family Procedure Rules 2010 (‘FPR') takes the ancillary relief practitioner through three distinct stages: apprehension, wishful thinking followed by a nagging sense of unease. Apprehension at the sheer volume of material contained in the FPR and Practice Directions (‘PD'); wishful thinking upon finding the ‘ancillary relief rules' re-packaged but substantially unchanged in FPR Part 9 and finally, a nagging sense of unease: surely the rules have not been so comprehensively re-written in order to remain the same? What has changed, and how significantly? This article considers the impact of the FPR on ancillary relief and similar financial proceedings. A ‘road map' is attached at the end, setting out where provisions from the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (‘the 1991 Rules') can be found in the FPR.

To read the rest of this article, see May [2011] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from