Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

Financial Remedies and the Family Procedure Rules 2010

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : AlexanderChandler-MayFLJ2011
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 2, 2011, 12:40 PM
Article ID : 95155

Alexander Chandler

Barrister, 1 Garden Court, Temple, London

The Family Procedure Rules 2010 (‘FPR') takes the ancillary relief practitioner through three distinct stages: apprehension, wishful thinking followed by a nagging sense of unease. Apprehension at the sheer volume of material contained in the FPR and Practice Directions (‘PD'); wishful thinking upon finding the ‘ancillary relief rules' re-packaged but substantially unchanged in FPR Part 9 and finally, a nagging sense of unease: surely the rules have not been so comprehensively re-written in order to remain the same? What has changed, and how significantly? This article considers the impact of the FPR on ancillary relief and similar financial proceedings. A ‘road map' is attached at the end, setting out where provisions from the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (‘the 1991 Rules') can be found in the FPR.

To read the rest of this article, see May [2011] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from