Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles

First meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Slug : APPG04112010
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 4, 2010, 09:10 AM
Article ID : 92545

ParliamentThe All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law met for the first time in the Palace of Westminster on Tuesday evening to debate What is Marriage? What obligations should it entail?

The aim of the Parliamentary Group is to look at issues that fall within the jurisdiction of the Family Courts, including the Court of Protection and discuss proposals for legislative reform.

Recently appointed High Court judge Sir Nicholas Mostyn opened the debate and questioned if marriage was an economic union, as the post White position would suggest, should one party have a right of confidentiality in respect of the papers of that partnership? On this point he highlighted the apparent paradox in the recent decisions of Radmacher and Imerman.

Sir Nicholas also commented that the courts have had to make up for a lack of legislation on the division of matrimonial property, and this has not always been consistent. He called on the Law Commission to expand its remit from examining the status and enforceability of nuptial agreements to include the legal context of marriage generally.

The Parliamentary Group is chaired by John Hemming MP, who in 2008 released a pop single, Bring the Sunshine In, to raise awareness for his Justice for Families Campaign Group. Speaking ahead of the inaugural debate, John Hemming said: "This is an important issue that does not get sufficient attention within Parliament. Baroness Deech has quite rightly started up a debate about this issue and this event will be a helpful part of taking that debate forwards."

Baroness Deech, the Parliamentary Group's Vice-Chair said: "The question of financial relief is one that has not been addressed by Parliament for decades. In changing economic times and with new perspectives on marriage, cohabitation and the roles of men and women in family life, it is time to reopen the debate about the principles that should govern the allocation of assets and support on divorce."

The next All Party Parliamentary Group meeting is on 30 November and will feature the Family Law Review Project.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from