Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles

First meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law

Sep 29, 2018, 17:35 PM
Slug : APPG04112010
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 4, 2010, 09:10 AM
Article ID : 92545

ParliamentThe All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law met for the first time in the Palace of Westminster on Tuesday evening to debate What is Marriage? What obligations should it entail?

The aim of the Parliamentary Group is to look at issues that fall within the jurisdiction of the Family Courts, including the Court of Protection and discuss proposals for legislative reform.

Recently appointed High Court judge Sir Nicholas Mostyn opened the debate and questioned if marriage was an economic union, as the post White position would suggest, should one party have a right of confidentiality in respect of the papers of that partnership? On this point he highlighted the apparent paradox in the recent decisions of Radmacher and Imerman.

Sir Nicholas also commented that the courts have had to make up for a lack of legislation on the division of matrimonial property, and this has not always been consistent. He called on the Law Commission to expand its remit from examining the status and enforceability of nuptial agreements to include the legal context of marriage generally.

The Parliamentary Group is chaired by John Hemming MP, who in 2008 released a pop single, Bring the Sunshine In, to raise awareness for his Justice for Families Campaign Group. Speaking ahead of the inaugural debate, John Hemming said: "This is an important issue that does not get sufficient attention within Parliament. Baroness Deech has quite rightly started up a debate about this issue and this event will be a helpful part of taking that debate forwards."

Baroness Deech, the Parliamentary Group's Vice-Chair said: "The question of financial relief is one that has not been addressed by Parliament for decades. In changing economic times and with new perspectives on marriage, cohabitation and the roles of men and women in family life, it is time to reopen the debate about the principles that should govern the allocation of assets and support on divorce."

The next All Party Parliamentary Group meeting is on 30 November and will feature the Family Law Review Project.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from