Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles

Court orders return of newborn baby

Sep 29, 2018, 17:22 PM
Slug : 31-01-2008-court-orders-return-of-newborn-baby
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jan 31, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89599

A High Court judge ordered the immediate return of a newborn baby yesterday saying the social workers had taken the child illegally.

The baby was only two-hours-old when he was taken from his 18-year-old mother at 4am yesterday morning by Nottingham social services.

Mr Justice Munby ordered that the baby should be returned to the mother, known as G, claiming that the boy could not be removed without a court order. The judge described the situation as "most unfortunate" and said no baby could be removed simply "as the result of a decision taken by officials in some room". He went on to say that "the professionals involved in this case should know better".

"There is no suggestion in the documents shown to me so far that the risk the mother is posing is a risk of exposing the child to immediate physical attack and physical harm."

Ian Wise, the barrister representing G in the emergency high court hearing at midday yesterday, said the baby was taken without the mother's consent after hospital staff were presented with a "birth plan" prepared by social services. The plan said the mother was to be separated from the child, and no contact allowed without supervision by social workers as the mother suffers from mental health problems.

However, Nottingham social services will today make an application to take the boy into care. The teenage mother's solicitor, Stuart Luke, said she planned to "vigorously contest" an application by the social services for an interim care order.

In a statement, the co-Chair of the Association of Lawyers for Children, Alistair MacDonald, said: "The State can only remove a child from the care of its parents if the court sanctions that removal. It is vital that parents and children are represented by specialist lawyers when the court is considering this incredibly difficult and far reaching decision. Sadly, current Government policy is making it increasingly difficult for parents to find specialist family lawyers locally to represent them when social services seek to remove their children."

"What would have happened in this case if the mother had not been able to find a family lawyer to take the case before a Judge so that the right decision could be made? As we have repeatedly said, a legal aid scheme that reduces the number of specialist family lawyers able to represent children and families is bad for children, bad for society and bad for the country as a whole."

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from