Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

MARRIAGE: MA v JA and the Attorney General [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:21 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc2219fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 7, 2012, 05:05 AM
Article ID : 99675

(Family Division, Moylan J, 27 July 2012) 

The husband, supported by the wife, submitted that a marriage ceremony conducted by an Imam at a Mosque was valid and sought a declaration under s 55(a) of the Family Law Act 1996. The Attorney General intervened and submitted it was not capable of recognition and was in effect a non-marriage.

At the time the ceremony took place the husband and wife were not informed of the formalities required under the Marriage Acts and as a result some of the requirements of the Acts were not fulfilled.

The presumption of marriage could not be applied to the case in order to establish the relevant requirements were fulfilled. However, the ceremony was of the kind permitted by English law and was in a form capable of producing a valid marriage. The declaration was granted.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from