Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
FINANCIAL REMEDIES:Hope v Krejci and Others  EWHC 1780 (Fam)
Sep 29, 2018, 18:17 PM
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article :
Prioritise In Trending Articles :
Jul 5, 2012, 03:20 AM
Article ID :99397
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 29 June 2012)
The husband had been ordered to pay the wife £268,000 plus £100,000 towards her substantial costs but a year after the order was made he had still failed to make payment. The husband had also failed to give full disclosure of assets held by a family trust and company structure. The wife applied for enforcement of the order under r 33.3 of the FPR 2010 and restored her original application for variation of the settlement.
Allowing the application and varying the order to allow for the transfer of specific assets to the wife from the family trust. Adjourning her enforcement application.