Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS: A and S v Lancashire County Council [2012] EWHC 1689 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 18:16 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1689fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jun 28, 2012, 06:10 AM
Article ID : 99289

(Family Division, Peter Jackson J, 21 June 2012) 

Two boys, now aged 16 and 14, were accommodated as infants and freed for adoption but were never permanently placed. They had been placed with numerous foster carers throughout their childhood, some of whom were abusive, and became increasingly unsettled and disturbed causing irreparable damage. Links with their birth family were lost despite their not being adopted and the reviewing system did nothing to correct it.

The court made declarations that the local authority and the reviewing officer had acted incompatibly with the boys Art 8, 6 and 3 rights under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from