Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT:X Primary Care Trust v XB [2012] EWHC 1390 (Fam), [2012] COPLR 577

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1390fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 24, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100571

(Family Division, Theis J, 1 May 2012)

The man suffered from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Motor Neurone Disease, since he was 57. For the previous 8 years he was assisted by an invasive ventilation device. He was able to communicate using a communication board and latterly through eye movements. Despite his care needs he had been cared for at home assisted by carers from an independent care agency and his wife.

At various times the man had indicated his wish to have life-sustaining treatment withdrawn but had not done so in a consistent form. He then decided to execute an advance direction that he wished to withdraw his consent to treatment if his disease progressed to the stage where he could no longer communicate and lost the ability to control his decisions of care and management. It was agreed by the GP, mental capacity co-ordinator and the man's wife.

On the evidence it was clear the man had capacity to make the advance direction and that it complied with all the necessary formalities. Despite the fact that the document had a review date, it was not the man's intention that the direction should become ineffective at some point in the future and that date merely ensured that it was kept under review.

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from