Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT:X Primary Care Trust v XB [2012] EWHC 1390 (Fam), [2012] COPLR 577

Sep 29, 2018, 18:29 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1390fam
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Oct 24, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 100571

(Family Division, Theis J, 1 May 2012)

The man suffered from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Motor Neurone Disease, since he was 57. For the previous 8 years he was assisted by an invasive ventilation device. He was able to communicate using a communication board and latterly through eye movements. Despite his care needs he had been cared for at home assisted by carers from an independent care agency and his wife.

At various times the man had indicated his wish to have life-sustaining treatment withdrawn but had not done so in a consistent form. He then decided to execute an advance direction that he wished to withdraw his consent to treatment if his disease progressed to the stage where he could no longer communicate and lost the ability to control his decisions of care and management. It was agreed by the GP, mental capacity co-ordinator and the man's wife.

On the evidence it was clear the man had capacity to make the advance direction and that it complied with all the necessary formalities. Despite the fact that the document had a review date, it was not the man's intention that the direction should become ineffective at some point in the future and that date merely ensured that it was kept under review.

Categories :
  • Court of Protection
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from