Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
Online event: An update on recovery in the civil, family courts & tribunals
HM Courts and Tribunals Service has announced that it is holding an online event to discuss its recovery plan for the civil, family courts and tribunals, which was published on 9 November 2020...
HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirms 2020 Christmas and new year closure dates
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has confirmed the dates over the Christmas and new year period in which Crown Courts, magistrates’ courts,...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
Focusing on behaviour and attitudes of separating parents
I am sure that if this year's Family Law Awards were an in-person event as usual, rather than this year’s virtual occasion, much of the chatter among family law professionals would be...
View all articles


Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1246
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 98789

(Family Division, Eleanor King J, 2 March 2012)

The parents lived in France with their child until she was 5 years old. At which time the parents agreed the mother and child would move to England as the maternal grandmother had cancer and in order for the child to attend an English school. The parents' marriage broke down and the mother and child remained in England and the father in France. The father issued divorce proceedings in France.

 The mother sought an adjournment of the French proceedings and was granted a residence order by the English court. The father contested the jurisdiction of the English court pursuant to BIIR. The French court transferred residence to the father and the mother appealed. The mother's appeal to the French High Court was dismissed.

 In the English proceedings the father eventually conceded that the child was habitually resident in England but he claimed the mother had accepted the jurisdiction of the French courts by engaging in proceedings there. The mother had not unequivocally accepted the French court's jurisdiction by appealing the transfer of residence order, in any event it was in the child's best interests to remain with her mother from whom she had never been apart. The child had lived in England since 2009 and attended an English school. Declining to invoke Recital 12(1)(b) to stay the proceedings as it was in the child's superior interests that the court of habitual residence should determine future issues.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from