Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

BRUSSELS II REVISED:VC v GC [2012] EWHC 1246 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1246
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 98789

(Family Division, Eleanor King J, 2 March 2012)

The parents lived in France with their child until she was 5 years old. At which time the parents agreed the mother and child would move to England as the maternal grandmother had cancer and in order for the child to attend an English school. The parents' marriage broke down and the mother and child remained in England and the father in France. The father issued divorce proceedings in France.

 The mother sought an adjournment of the French proceedings and was granted a residence order by the English court. The father contested the jurisdiction of the English court pursuant to BIIR. The French court transferred residence to the father and the mother appealed. The mother's appeal to the French High Court was dismissed.

 In the English proceedings the father eventually conceded that the child was habitually resident in England but he claimed the mother had accepted the jurisdiction of the French courts by engaging in proceedings there. The mother had not unequivocally accepted the French court's jurisdiction by appealing the transfer of residence order, in any event it was in the child's best interests to remain with her mother from whom she had never been apart. The child had lived in England since 2009 and attended an English school. Declining to invoke Recital 12(1)(b) to stay the proceedings as it was in the child's superior interests that the court of habitual residence should determine future issues.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from