Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Perspectives on civil partnerships and marriages in England and Wales: aspects, attitudes and assessments
IntroductionThis article considers the developments since the turn of the century in the provision of new options for same sex and opposite sex couples to formalise their unions with full legal...
Family Law journal - take the survey and you could win £50 worth of vouchers
Do you subscribe to Family Law journal?Our aim is to provide all subscribers of Family Law with compelling, insightful and helpful content that you enjoy reading and find useful in your...
Commencement date of 6 April 2022 announced for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (DDSA 2020), which received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, will now have a commencement date of 6 April 2022....
HMCTS blog highlights the use of video hearing due to COVID-19
HM Courts & Tribunals Service has published a blog detailing the impacts of coronavirus (COVID-19) on hearings. Pre-pandemic, HMCTS states that the use of video technology for live participation...
View all articles
Authors

BRUSSELS II REVISED:VC v GC [2012] EWHC 1246 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012ewhc1246
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 16, 2012, 02:30 AM
Article ID : 98789

(Family Division, Eleanor King J, 2 March 2012)

The parents lived in France with their child until she was 5 years old. At which time the parents agreed the mother and child would move to England as the maternal grandmother had cancer and in order for the child to attend an English school. The parents' marriage broke down and the mother and child remained in England and the father in France. The father issued divorce proceedings in France.

 The mother sought an adjournment of the French proceedings and was granted a residence order by the English court. The father contested the jurisdiction of the English court pursuant to BIIR. The French court transferred residence to the father and the mother appealed. The mother's appeal to the French High Court was dismissed.

 In the English proceedings the father eventually conceded that the child was habitually resident in England but he claimed the mother had accepted the jurisdiction of the French courts by engaging in proceedings there. The mother had not unequivocally accepted the French court's jurisdiction by appealing the transfer of residence order, in any event it was in the child's best interests to remain with her mother from whom she had never been apart. The child had lived in England since 2009 and attended an English school. Declining to invoke Recital 12(1)(b) to stay the proceedings as it was in the child's superior interests that the court of habitual residence should determine future issues.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from