Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

CARE PROCEEDINGS:Re L-B (Reversal of Judgment) [2012] EWCA Civ 98

Sep 29, 2018, 18:20 PM
Slug : 2012ewcaciv98
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 24, 2012, 02:35 AM
Article ID : 99589

(Court of Appeal, Thorpe, Rimer LJJ, Sir Stephen Sedley, 18 July 2012) 

The mother had mental health difficulties. A fact-finding hearing took place to determine the cause of a number of serious injuries to the child. The judge announced at the conclusion of the hearing that he found that the father was responsible. The order, however, was never sealed. The local authority in reliance on the decision made plans for the child to be placed with the maternal grandparents alongside an older sibling.

When the judgment was prepared and circulated the judge said that having reconsidered the matter he found it was impossible to identify a sole perpetrator and could not exclude the mother from the pool of potential perpetrators. The mother appealed.

Thorpe and Sedley LJJ in allowing the appeal, found that although a judge had jurisdiction to recall an order before it was sealed, something more was needed than a change of mind to justify the reversal of a judgment. Rimer LJ dissented. He found that the judge was honouring the judicial oath by correcting what was recognized as a fundamental error on her part.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from