Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL REMEDIES: B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:29 PM
Slug : 2012EWHC265
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 16, 2012, 10:32 AM
Article ID : 98075

(Family Division; Mostyn J; 17 February 2012)

A 14-year marriage, two children aged 10 and 12. Alleged agreement between the parties that they had adopted a matrimonial property regime of separate property that was made when they married in Catalonia. Further express separation of property agreement made in another country. Neither party were aware of full implications of agreement or default matrimonial regime under which they married, disregarded in assessment of award. Summary of Catalan law led the judge to a conclusion that the court may depart from the default position where it would be unjust to implement it and likely to be so when economic imbalance exists between the parties . In considering the applicable principles relevant to capital division, it was held that the principles of sharing and need are likely to be the most applicable and compensation was restricted to exceptional cases as exemplified in McFarlane v McFarlane .

The law relating to an award of periodical payments was not so clear. Simplicity and clarity are needed in this area just as much in the field of capital division. Save in the exceptional kind of case exemplified by McFarlane, a periodical payments claim should, the judge held, be adjudged (or settled), generally speaking, by reference to the principle of need alone. The husband's company was worth £6m, equal division, £3m payable to wife in three instalments. Periodical payments of £10,000pm, falling incrementally until lump sum payment completed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from