Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles
Authors

FINANCIAL REMEDIES: B v S (Financial Remedy: Marital Property Regime) [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:29 PM
Slug : 2012EWHC265
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 16, 2012, 10:32 AM
Article ID : 98075

(Family Division; Mostyn J; 17 February 2012)

A 14-year marriage, two children aged 10 and 12. Alleged agreement between the parties that they had adopted a matrimonial property regime of separate property that was made when they married in Catalonia. Further express separation of property agreement made in another country. Neither party were aware of full implications of agreement or default matrimonial regime under which they married, disregarded in assessment of award. Summary of Catalan law led the judge to a conclusion that the court may depart from the default position where it would be unjust to implement it and likely to be so when economic imbalance exists between the parties . In considering the applicable principles relevant to capital division, it was held that the principles of sharing and need are likely to be the most applicable and compensation was restricted to exceptional cases as exemplified in McFarlane v McFarlane .

The law relating to an award of periodical payments was not so clear. Simplicity and clarity are needed in this area just as much in the field of capital division. Save in the exceptional kind of case exemplified by McFarlane, a periodical payments claim should, the judge held, be adjudged (or settled), generally speaking, by reference to the principle of need alone. The husband's company was worth £6m, equal division, £3m payable to wife in three instalments. Periodical payments of £10,000pm, falling incrementally until lump sum payment completed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from