Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles

RELOCATION: Re Z (Relocation) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam)

Sep 29, 2018, 21:29 PM
Slug : 2012EWHC139
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Mar 23, 2012, 05:19 AM
Article ID : 98101

(Family Division; Pauffley J; 2 February 2012)

The Australian mother and Belgian father married in Australia where their 6-year-old daughter was born. They relocated to Belgium. When they separated the mother took the child to England and brought proceedings seeking permission to relocate with the child to Australia. The father wrongfully retained the child during contact in Belgium for 11 months. The father sought a shared residence order. Consequences of wrongful retention had been devastating to mother and child, mother had always been primary carer. Residence with the father would be contrary to child's welfare. The mother was isolated, lacking in support in England and feared child would be abducted again. The mother claimed she would bring the child to England for contact once a year and allow extended Skype contact. There was a real potential for deterioration in the mother's mental well-being if application refused. The father had become focused on own needs rather than those of his daughter. The guardian was unable to make definitive recommendation, child undecided about move to Australia. Mother granted residence and permission to relocate to Australia as there was no doubt that that was in the child's best interests. 


Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from