Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Resolution issues Brexit notes for family lawyers ahead of IP completion day
Family lawyer organisation, Resolution, has issued two joint notes to assist family lawyers in England and Wales ahead of the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period at 11 pm on 31 December...
Online filing is real-time on New Year's Eve: practice direction change to accommodate EU withdrawal arrangements
I have heard that there will be an amendment to the relevant practice directions to provide that online applications received on New Year’s Eve after 4:30 PM and before 11:00 PM will count as...
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v AB
The issue in this case concerned AB’s capacity to make specific decisions about treatment relating to her anorexia nervosa. She was 28 years old and had suffered with anorexia since the age of...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Remote hearings in family proceedings – how is justice perceived?
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate:  “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against....
View all articles
Authors

COMMON INTENTION CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST: Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555

Sep 29, 2018, 21:31 PM
Slug : 2012EWCACiv555
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : May 8, 2012, 08:29 AM
Article ID : 98779

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Etherton, Lewison LJJ; 29 March 2012)

The couple were in a relationship for 19 years and had a 20-year-old son. The woman was still married to her husband for 12 years during the new relationship. The couple moved to Hastings to run a guesthouse the man had bought with his savings and when they separated the woman claimed to have acquired a beneficial interest in the guesthouse or that she and the man had been in partnership.

The claim of a common intention constructive trust was dismissed and the judge found that the man bought the property as an investment. There was no intention at the time of purchase that the woman should have an interest and no evidence that the intention changed or that the woman had taken steps to change her own position in reliance on any assertion that she should have an interest. The judge had not been plainly wrong in his conclusion and the woman's appeal was dismissed.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from